Top Five Workplace Compensation and Benefits Plan

Many employers are giving employees greater flexibility to work alternative schedules, including hybrid arrangements (i.e., some in-person and some remote work) or continuing to work entirely remotely. To meet the moment and help with retention and recruiting, employers are reexamining their employee benefits, focusing on employees’ immediate needs other than cash compensation.

Based on inquiries from BDO clients, we have identified the following as the top five current workplace compensation and benefits trends.
 
1. Unlimited Paid Time Off (PTO). Chief financial officers might embrace the concept of unlimited PTO, because it eliminates accruals of earned but unused PTO, carryovers and cash-outs upon termination. Getting rid of that liability can boost the employer’s financials and make payroll easier and more consistent. However, management may be concerned that some employees would abuse an unlimited PTO policy, while others would not take enough days off to avoid burnout, so those issues must be addressed.
 
For employees, unlimited PTO has pros and cons. On the one hand, it could improve morale by giving employees the ability to address their individual work-life balance and demonstrate the employer’s commitment to overall employee wellness. With unlimited PTO, employees would have no incentive to go to work when they are sick, which can help avoid spreading COVID and other contagious diseases among the work force. Some employees may value a job that provides greater flexibility over more pay. Offering a unique benefit may attract or retain top talent in a competitive market. On the other hand, extra cash from PTO cash-outs would no longer be available.
 
Of course, having an unlimited PTO policy means that employers can no longer offer greater PTO as a reward (for example, as part of a promotion). Also, switching to an unlimited PTO program may be costly if accrued vacation must be paid out under state or local law. Some employers may simply freeze accrued PTO balances, to be used on a FIFO basis. Unlimited PTO also complicates compliance with certain federal and state mandates, such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) or minimum PTO rules.
 
2. Employer-paid student loan debt and education. Over the past few years, more employers have expressed an interest in helping employees repay their student loan debt as part of the employer’s recruiting and retention efforts. Unfortunately, if an employer simply pays an employee’s student loan debt, such payment is taxable wage income to the employee and is subject to income and employment tax withholding (and the employer would have to pay its share of employment taxes on those payments).
 
For 2020, the CARES Act allowed employers to repay up to $5,250 in employee student loan debt tax-free. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020 (CAA) extended that relief through December 31, 2025. To make tax-free student loan payments to employees, employers would need a written plan that complies with Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 127 tuition assistance rules. Section 127 plans can provide tax-free payments for current education as well as student loan debt. Courses do not need to be job related. Eligibility for such plans is generally broad-based, provided the employee meets the stated criteria, which cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees or owners.
 
Employers can also offer employees tax-free, job-related education as a working condition fringe benefit under IRC Section 132. Working condition fringe benefits can be provided on a case-by-case basis and need not be a broad-based program available to all employees.
 
Some employers want to provide tax-free scholarships to employees (or their family members), but employer-paid scholarships are generally taxable income to the employee (even if the employer pays the school directly). The IRS’s rules for employers providing employees (or their family members) with tax-free scholarships are very narrow.
 
3. Reimbursing work-from-home expenses. For employers’ reimbursements of business expenses incurred by employees who are working remotely to be tax-free, the reimbursements must be made under what the IRS calls an “accountable plan.” An accountable plan requires that the employer must have a written plan or policy to reimburse expenses that have a business connection, so long as employees submit an expense report within a reasonable period of time (i.e., 60 days). Generally, receipts are required for business expenses unless the amounts are under $75 (or are for lodging). Accountable plans are not only used for business travel, meals, lodging and transportation, but also can be used for any other business costs, such as work-from-home expenses.
 
When COVID converted many employees into remote workers, numerous employers began reimbursing employees for their business use of home internet and personal cell phones. Although IRS Notice 2011-72 generally makes employer-provided cell phones a tax-free fringe benefit, reimbursement for business use of a personal cell phone (and internet) remains subject to the IRS’s accountable plan rules. In short, despite many employees’ quick pivot to a mandatory remote work environment, the IRS has not published any tax reporting or income inclusion relief for employer-paid business use of personal internet or cell phone. Therefore, employees must submit an expense report within a reasonable period of time after incurring the expense to obtain a tax-free reimbursement from their employer for the business use of their personal internet or cell phone.
 
Employers who simply “reimburse” employees a flat amount periodically for business use of their personal internet or cell phone outside of the accountable plan rules generally must treat such amounts as taxable wage income.
 
Separate from the accountable plan rules, IRC Section 139 allows employers to make tax-free, tax-deductible “qualified disaster relief payments” to employees who incurred expenses that “but for” COVID (or another federally declared disaster, such as fires, floods, hurricanes, etc.), they would not have incurred. COVID was declared a federal disaster on March 13, 2020 and at some point, the federal disaster declaration will be lifted. Until that time, IRC Section 139 offers broad relief.
 
4. State and local taxes and withholding on remote work. Remote employees who work in a state or local jurisdiction that is not the same as their regular work location can trigger state and local taxes for the employer. This is known as the employer having a “nexus” with that state or local area based on the employee’s work presence. Although some taxing authorities announced special COVID relief from their general nexus rules, some did not (and some have lifted the relief). For example, in addition to withholding and paying state and local income and employment taxes, state and local sales tax, property tax, “doing business” tax and other taxes may apply to the employer, even if the employer was unaware that an employee was working in that jurisdiction.
 
Employers need to have systems in place to know where all of their employees are working at all times. Some employers give employees flexibility on where they can work, but list states or local areas that are off limits.
 
5. Back-up child care. As the number of COVID-vaccinated individuals increases, many of those vaccinated individuals feel more confident about returning to regular life, including work, child care and school. But since children under age 12 cannot yet get a COVID vaccine and as the highly contagious Delta variant continues to spread even to vaccinated individuals, employees may find that their regular child care provider has sent their child home because of a low-grade fever or coughing or sneezing more than once, or that the employee or their children must self-quarantine due to COVID exposure. To address the sudden, unexpected need for child care, some employers are providing emergency, “back-up” child care, either in employees’ homes or in child care centers.
 
If an employer pays for a specified number of hours of child care from a provider on a contingency use basis (that is, the employer pays for the care regardless of whether it is used or not) and the employee uses the available back-up child care, the employee generally has imputed taxable wage income equal to the fair market value of the child care provided (regardless of any discount the employer may have received when it purchased the block of child care hours), minus any co-pay the employee may have paid. Employers are generally required to report the imputed income on the employee’s Form W-2 and to withhold income and employment taxes from other earned pay.
 
For back-up child care to be tax-free to the employee, the employer needs to have a dependent care assistance plan that complies with IRC Section 129. Employers generally can provide, at the employer’s expense (and exclude from employees’ taxable income) up to $5,000 of child care as long as the employer satisfies Section 129’s nondiscrimination and usage rules.
 
If employers want employees to pay for the back-up child care, employees can do so on a tax-free basis if the employer makes the IRC Section 129 plan available under an IRC Section 125 cafeteria (“flexible benefits”) plan. In that case, the employee must have made a timely election under the cafeteria plan to set aside a designated amount of their salary to be used to pay dependent care expenses pre-tax.
 
Annual caps apply to how much can be set aside tax-free under IRC Section 129 plans (the cap is generally $5,000 per year, but for 2021 only, the cap is $10,500). Cafeteria plans have a “use it or lose it” rule, although certain carryovers are allowed as part of plan design. Even though the IRS has issued some COVID relief for IRC 129 and 125 plans for 2021 and 2022, it is not nearly as broad as what taxpayers had hoped.
 
Employers are likely to continue to face many other COVID-related issues. Federal, state and local authorities continue to issue rules intended to help them collect their fair share of taxes. At the same time, those agencies also continue to issue rules intended to help employers and employees rebound from the pandemic and avoid triggering further public health emergencies, often in the face of natural disasters. Tax rules generally lag in providing relief, and the rules frequently change.

Written by Norma Sharara and Joan Vines. Copyright © 2021 BDO USA, LLP. All rights reserved. www.bdo.com

Q&A: An Economist’s Take On The U.S. Real Estate Industry

Mark Dotzour is a real estate economist who served for 18 years as Chief Economist of the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University in College Station. He has clients in the banking, private equity and real estate industries, among others, and presents to audiences around the world. His research can be found in the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Money Magazine and Bloomberg Businessweek.

In this Q&A, BDO National Real Estate & Construction Co-Lead Kristi Gibson speaks with Mark about his outlook for the industry.

Kristi: Hi Mark, thanks so much for participating in this Q&A. You joined us for our webcast in June, “Post-pandemic trends in private equity real estate,” where you talked in part about the recovery trajectories of different sectors of the real estate industry in light of macroeconomic dynamics. We wanted to continue the thread of that conversation here.

First, briefly, can you recap for us where you see the real estate sector today vis a vis the economy?

Mark: Sure, Kristi. Back at the beginning of 2021, I said that the economic recovery would be 100% correlated with the percentage of people who were vaccinated. That is playing out, but the percentage of people who have been vaccinated started to peak at just over half the population, so our economic recovery is peaking, too. With this new delta variant of the virus taking off, the risk is greater that health mandates get put back into place, which will restrict businesses’ ability to operate to the fullest of their ability and consequently slow down economic growth. The delta variant is becoming a real drag on the economy and is contributing to inflation fear.

In terms of economic recovery, I’ve mentioned how we might have two V-shapes and then a jobless recovery. We saw the first V-shape in the spring as vaccination rates increased. But the second leg of the V has been short-circuited by delta. We appear now to be moving into the jobless recovery, where job growth slows substantially.

“When inflation fears run high, global investment demand for real estate intensifies. … We’ll continue to see capital flow into real estate, with more and more institutional funds raising capital to invest in this space.”

Kristi: With that in mind, what’s the impact on the real estate industry?

Mark: The power of the initial recovery this spring caused a dramatic increase in the Consumer Price Index. CPI inflation is now running about 5% and this has exacerbated latent fears of “runaway inflation.” When inflation fears run high, global investment demand for real estate intensifies. That’s why we are still seeing cap rate compression and extraordinary price increases in houses. Unless Congress or the Fed does something to dampen inflation concerns, we’ll continue to see capital flow into real estate, with more and more institutional funds raising capital to invest in this space.

Kristi: Within real estate, capital is flowing to different sectors. The industrial and residential sectors have truly come out on top of this pandemic, but the response of other sectors is a bit more complex, isn’t it?

Mark: Definitely. Retail, for example—and I spoke about this in the webcast, but I’ll just summarize quickly here, too—is a mixed bag. Certain retailers are doing really well, and others aren’t. A triple net lease on a freestanding building leased out to a major pharmacy chain is gold plated. But a little shopping center two blocks down that used to have a small grocery store, a flower shop and other little stores is a totally different ballgame. But retail is more on the dance floor than it was just 90 days ago. Even if the fundamentals aren’t there, when the headlines come out that retail is performing better than expected, that piques investor interest again.

Kristi: The office market is another sector where judgment is being reserved a bit. Can you talk a bit about that?

Mark: Until delta, it appeared that after Labor Day, we would start to get a clearer picture of what stabilized office demand will look like. Now that clarity won’t be revealed until next spring. The office market hasn’t had price discovery yet, and I don’t think we’ll see that until we know what stabilized demand looks like. The back-to-office movement has plateaued in tandem with the vaccination rate, and if in the fall public schools are hybrid and parents have to stay home, that’ll put a further damper on the office sector.

The real darlings are industrial and multifamily. This has been pretty well covered. What I will say about industrial is that it’s the asset class most vulnerable to overbuilding. There’s capital available for building and it’s a very attractive asset right now in the U.S. It’s not overbuilt, but the risk there is higher than with the other asset classes.

Multifamily is my favorite in terms of the supply/demand balance. Investor demand is strong and cap rates are still compressing. Nobody can build class B and C apartments, and some are being torn down and replaced by other land uses, so it’s the only asset class that has a negative supply.

The last sector I’ll mention is single-family-built-for-rent, which has gained significant momentum in the last few years. There’s a housing shortage in every market that is experiencing job growth, and now there are homebuilders who build houses, even entire communities, that can then be bought up by companies that turn around and rent them out. I see a lot of positive momentum—and returns—in this sector.

“Net domestic migration is the metric you want to be watching for when shopping for the right investment opportunity.”

Kristi: Let’s talk about another big influence: tax reform. Where do you think we will net out, and what do you think the impact on real estate will be?

Mark: Seven months before the tax reform bill was signed into law in 1986, transaction volume dried up. That’s going to be the signal for me. As long as transaction volume is holding up, the market is saying it isn’t going to happen. But as soon as transaction volume starts to stall, that’s the market saying tax reform is coming.

Currently, there is extra selling pressure in the market that wasn’t there four or five months ago—some investors are exiting investments now to get out ahead of anticipated tax law changes. If the momentum for tax reform builds, there will be more selling pressure between now and the end of the year. If there were ever going to be any distressed buying opportunities, this is going to be one of them. But for every investor with a distressed asset to sell, there are 100 investors who want to deploy capital, so a huge impact on prices is unlikely.

A slowdown in deal volume will occur if buyers see a greater probability for a tax law change, at which point they’ll either lower their bid prices or step to the sidelines until tax reform passes. Sellers are historically slow to respond to lower bid prices, so deal volume could be sluggish for months after tax reform is signed into law. Then, when the first sellers (likely distressed) come back into the market, the bid/ask spread will begin to narrow, and as that happens, deal volume will pick up again and the market will reach a new, lower equilibrium price.

“Work from home is opening up new development opportunities outside the traditional 45-minute commute radius.”

Kristi: How do you see the work-from-home paradigm changing the real estate landscape? I co-authored a piece on suburban migration and the impact population migration may have on the industry, so I’m interested in your thoughts as well.

Mark: Net domestic migration is the metric you want to be watching for when shopping for the right investment opportunity. Work from home is opening up new development opportunities outside the traditional 45-minute commute radius. That 45-minute rule of thumb came from studies done on how much time an employee commuting five times a week would tolerate. But if employees are working just two or three times per week in the office, perhaps that radius expands a bit as a moderately longer commute becomes more tolerable—say, 60 minutes. That means opportunity for all types of land development in that 15-minute geographical gap that just opened up—single family, apartment, retail, even office. People working in the same space together all day every day may find it beneficial to pay $500/month for office space outside their homes.

Kristi: You alluded to the urban office market earlier. Can you elaborate a bit on what the opportunities might be for big cities going forward? We’ve seen potential foreign investors expressing interest in the major cities—New York, San Francisco, Chicago—operating under the belief that there is enough of a bottom in the market now that they will benefit greatly from a market upswing over a five- to seven-year hold period.

Mark: That’s not surprising—those are considered the “gateway” cities for foreign investors. For people looking to invest in cities, it’s important to evaluate where there’s momentum behind a positive urban environment and look at the quality of urban lifestyle. When evaluating urban investments, you should be using a secondary set of criteria, other than population growth, because when you lose a positive urban environment, past historical population trends are moot.

Kristi: Do you have any last thoughts before we go?

Mark: For the first time in nearly 40 years, inflation is here. Whether it’s transient or not, current investor fervor for real estate is a reflection of that. The level of interest in all segments of real estate investment is going to rise in tandem with the fears that inflation is not transitory. Prices are high today and yields are low, but higher inflation expectations could push prices higher.

Kristi: Thanks for your time and for sharing your thoughts with us, Mark.

Copyright © 2021 BDO USA, LLP. All rights reserved. www.bdo.com


House Ways And Means Committee Advances Tax Legislation As Part Of Reconciliation Bill

After almost 40 hours of debate over four days, the House Ways and Means Committee on September 15 approved a tax package that would increase rates on high-net-worth individuals and corporations and affect cross-border activity and pass-through entities, advancing the tax elements of the Biden administration’s “Build Back Better” agenda.

The package advanced on a largely party-line 24-19 vote – no Republicans voted for it, and only one Democrat, Rep. Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., voted against it.

As the next step in the legislative process, the legislation now goes to the House Budget Committee, where it will be combined with bills from other House committees and eventually brought before the full House for a vote as the reconciliation legislation.    


Individuals

The draft legislation would raise the top individual marginal tax rate from the current 37% to 39.6% for taxable income over $450,000 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses, $425,000 for head of households, $400,000 for single individuals, $225,000 for married individuals filing separately, and $12,500 for estates and trusts. The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.

The capital gains tax rate would rise to 25% from 20% for transactions by high-income individuals made after Sept. 13, 2021.

The bill would also create a 3% surcharge on modified gross adjusted income above $5 million, and set a limit on contributions to large individual retirement accounts.

The bill would extend the holding period to obtain long-term capital gains treatment for gain allocated to carried interest partners from three to five years. The three-year holding period would remain in effect with respect to any income attributable to real property trades or businesses and for taxpayers (other than an estate or trust) with adjusted gross income of less than $400,000.


Business Provisions

The legislation would introduce a graduated income tax rate structure for most corporations, with a top corporate tax rate of 26.5%. Corporations with taxable income that does not exceed $400,000 would be subject to a new 18% tax rate (lower than the current 21% rate), while those with income that exceeds $400,000 but does not exceed $5 million would be subject to a 21% tax rate, and those with income in excess of $5 million would be subject to the top 26.5% rate.

On the international front, the bill would reduce the Section 250 deduction for global intangible low-taxed Income (GILTI) to 37.5%, resulting in an effective tax rate of 16.5% based on a corporate tax rate of 26.5%. The GILTI would be calculated on a country-by-country basis. Other international tax provisions include:

  • The deduction for qualified business asset investment (QBAI) would be reduced to 5%;
  • The foreign tax credit haircut would be reduced to 5%;
  • The tax on foreign-derived intangible income would rise to an effective rate of 20.7% based on a corporate tax rate of 26.5%;
  • Excess foreign tax credit carryforwards would be allowed for five years but carrybacks would be disallowed; and
  • A new limitation on interest expense deductions for some multinational corporations would be introduced.


What’s Not in the Bill

The Ways and Means tax bill does not include any changes to the cap on individual itemized deductions for state and local taxes, which was introduced in 2017’s tax reform. Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) has said he is committed to include “meaningful SALT relief” in the final legislation.

A provision to end the tax-free step-up in basis above a $1 million threshold that was proposed by the Biden administration is also not included in the Ways and Means bill.

Written by Todd Simmens. Copyright © 2021 BDO USA, LLP. All rights reserved. www.bdo.com