Additional Guidance On The Employee Retention Credit Issued By IRS

On August 4, 2021, the IRS issued Notice 2021-49, which provides long overdue guidance for employers that have taken or are considering taking the employee retention credit (ERC) as initially made available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and modified and extended under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA). Generally, the maximum ERC for 2020 is $5,000 per employee, while the maximum for 2021 is $28,000 per employee.

The ARPA extended the ERC for wages paid after June 30, 2021 and before January 1, 2022. The IRS previously issued nearly 100 frequently asked questions (FAQs) and two notices (Notice 2021-20 and 2021-23) in an attempt to provide guidance on the ERC. However, these FAQs and notices fail to address some important questions, such as whether cash tips received by employees and wages paid to an owner with more than 50% ownership of a company are qualified wages for the ERC. Notice 2021-49 addresses this issue and clarifies other issues related to the mechanics of the credit. The notice also clarifies and provides additional guidance for several other important provisions of the ERC as modified by the ARPA.

In addition, on August 10, 2021, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2021-33, which provides a safe harbor for employers to exclude (1) the amount of the forgiveness of a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan under the Small Business Act, (2) a shuttered venue operator grant under the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Economic Aid Act), and (3) a restaurant revitalization grant under the ARPA from “gross receipts” for purposes of determining eligibility to claim the ERC.

Background

The CARES Act provides for a refundable tax credit for eligible employers that pay qualified wages, including certain health plan expenses, to some or all employees after March 12, 2020 and before January 1, 2021.

The Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020 (Relief Act) amended and made technical changes to the ERC for qualified wages paid after March 12, 2020 and before January 1, 2021, primarily expanding eligibility for certain employers to claim the credit. The Relief Act also extended the ERC to qualified wages paid after December 31, 2020 and before July 1, 2021 and modified the calculation of the credit amount for qualified wages paid during that time. The Relief Act permitted employers to qualify for the ERC if they experienced revenue declines of 20% (previously 50%), and it changed the definition of large employer from an employer that averaged 100 employees to one that averages 500 employees, enabling businesses with 500 or fewer employees to take the ERC for all wages paid, rather than only for wage payments for which no services were provided. The Relief Act also allowed employers that received PPP loans to also take the ERC, retroactive to March 2020.

The following summarizes Revenue Procedure 2021-33 and some of the most significant issues addressed in Notice 2021-49.

Safe Harbor for Gross Receipts – Revenue Procedure 2021-33

Under Internal Revenue Code Section 448(c) for for-profit entities and Section 6033 for tax-exempt organizations, PPP loan forgiveness, shuttered venue operator grants and restaurant revitalization grants are not included in employers’ gross income but are included in gross receipts. Revenue Procedure 2021-33 provides a safe harbor for employers to exclude those amounts from gross receipts solely for determining ERC eligibility. The IRS said that Congress intended for employers to be able to participate in these relief programs and also claim the ERC. Therefore, including amounts provided under those relief programs in gross receipts for determining eligibility for the ERC would be inconsistent with Congressional intent.

Under the revenue procedure, an employer is required to consistently apply the safe harbor by (1) excluding the amount of the forgiveness of any PPP loan and the amount of any shuttered venue operator grant and restaurant revitalization grant from its gross receipts for all relevant quarters in determining eligibility to claim the ERC, and (2) applying the safe harbor to all employers treated as a single employer under the ERC aggregation rules.

Employers elect to use the new safe harbor by excluding amounts under those relief programs when claiming the ERC on Form 941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Payroll Tax Form (or 941-X if filing an amended return). In other words, a separate “election” form is not needed. If an employer revokes its safe harbor election, it must adjust all employment tax returns that are affected by the revocation. Employers must retain in their records support for claiming the ERC, including their use of this new safe harbor for determining gross receipts.

Clarifications to the ERC Under Notice 2021-49

Applicable Employment Taxes

Notice 2021-49 confirms that, for the third and fourth quarters of 2021, eligible employers can claim the ERC against the employer’s share of Medicare tax (or the portion of Tier 1 tax under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act) after these taxes are reduced by any credits allowed under the ARPA for qualified sick leave wages and qualified family leave wages, with any excess refunded.

Recovery Startup Business

An ERC of up to $50,000 per quarter is available to “recovery startup businesses.” A recovery startup business is an employer that began carrying on a trade or business after February 15, 2020. The notice clarifies that an employer is not considered to have begun carrying on a trade or business until such time as the business has begun to function as a going concern and performed those activities for which it was organized.

The notice also states that a not-for-profit organization can be treated as an eligible employer due to being a recovery startup business based on all of its operations and average annual gross receipts. For ERC purposes, a not-for-profit organization is deemed to be a “trade or business.”

Further, a recovery startup business that has 500 or fewer full-time employees may treat all wages paid with respect to an employee during the quarter as “qualified wages.”

Finally, the aggregation rules apply when determining whether an employer is a recovery startup business, as well as to the $50,000 limitation on the credit. Thus, a recovery startup business would need to apply IRC Sections 52(a) (for related corporations), 52(b) (for related non-corporate entities, such as partnerships, trusts, etc.) and 414(m) (affiliated service group rules).

Qualified Wages

Qualified wages generally are determined differently based on whether the employer is a small or large employer, in that qualified wages for large employers are limited to wages paid to an employee for time the employee is not providing services due to a full or partial suspension of business operations or a decline in the employer’s gross receipts.

The notice clarifies the rule for qualified wages for a “severely financially distressed employer” (SFDE). An SFDE is an employer that, in the third or fourth quarter of 2021, has gross receipts of less than 10% of its gross receipts for the same quarter in 2019. For SFDEs, qualified wages are any wages paid in the quarter, regardless of the size of the employer. This is different from the standard ERC rule, which limits qualified wages for large employers to wages paid while the employee is not performing services.

Full-Time Employees Versus Full-Time Equivalents

Confusion abounds about the definition of “full-time employee” and whether “full-time equivalents” are to be included when determining whether an employer eligible for the ERC is a large or small employer. Notice 2021-49 clarifies that eligible employers are not required to include full-time equivalents when determining the average number of full-time employees. The notice also confirms that wages paid to an employee who is not a full-time employee may be treated as qualified wages if all other requirements are met.

Treatment of Tips and FICA Tip Credit

Considerable confusion has arisen as to whether tips count as qualified wages for the ERC, since customers (not the employer) generally pay the employee the tips. Notice 2021-49 clarifies that cash tips are qualified wages if all other requirements to treat the amounts as qualified wages are met. The notice also confirms that eligible employers are not prevented from receiving both the ERC and the FICA tip tax credit on the same wages.

Timing of Qualified Wages Deduction Disallowance

The IRS has provided guidance on the timing of the disallowance for wage deductions on the employer’s federal tax return relating to qualified wages claimed for the ERC. The IRS previously confirmed that employers must reduce the deduction claimed for employee wages on their federal tax return by the amount of qualified wages claimed under the ERC. Notice 2021-49 confirms that this reduction in the deduction amount must occur in the same tax year the ERC is claimed. Accordingly, if an employer files a claim for the credit for a prior tax year, it must also file an amended federal tax return to reduce the amount of the wage deduction claimed in the corresponding period.

Related Individuals

The IRS previously stated that wages paid to related individuals, as defined by IRC Section 51(i)(1), are not taken into account for ERC purposes. Notice 2021-49 clarifies that, by applying the ownership attribution rules, the definition of a “related individual” includes a majority owner (i.e., a person with more than 50% ownership) of an entity if the majority owner has a brother or sister (whether by whole or half-blood), ancestor or lineal descendant. The spouse of a majority owner is also a related individual for purposes of the ERC if the majority owner has a family member who is a brother or sister (whether by whole or half-blood), ancestor or lineal descendant.

Insight

Wages paid to a sole owner or majority owner will rarely qualify for the ERC, according to the guidance provided in Notice 2021-49, because of the way the ownership attribution rules are applied. The owner must have no family other than a spouse in order to treat his or her wages as qualified wages. Members of Congress have voiced their disagreement with this guidance. It is possible the IRS will revise their position regarding related individuals in future guidance.

Alternative Quarter Election for Calendar Quarters in 2021

The Treasury Department and the IRS have been asked whether an eligible employer must consistently use the alternative quarter election once it has been made. The Notice 2021-49 confirms that employers are not required to use the alternative quarter election consistently. For example, an employer may be an eligible employer due to a decline in gross receipts for the second quarter of 2021 using the standard quarter comparison; the employer could then use the alternative quarter election to be an eligible employer for the third quarter of 2021.

Gross Receipts Safe Harbor in Notice 2021-20

Notice 2021-49 confirms that the safe harbor rule that allows an employer to include the gross receipts of an acquired business that it did not own during a calendar quarter in 2019 continues to apply to employers that acquire businesses in 2021 for purposes of measuring whether there was a decline in gross receipts. In addition, an employer that came into existence in 2020 (e.g., the third quarter of 2020) should use that quarter to determine whether it experienced a significant decline in gross receipts for the first three quarters in 2021 and should determine whether it experienced a significant decline in gross receipts by comparing the fourth quarter of 2020 to the fourth quarter of 2021.

Insights

Guidance provided in Notice 2021-49 has created several opportunities for certain employers to obtain additional ERCs. For example, some restaurant employers may not have included cash tips as qualified wages for their previous ERC claims. Under the notice, those employers can now file amended returns to claim additional ERCs or employers who did not count amounts paid to full-time equivalent employees as qualified wages for the ERC may now do so. Revenue Procedure 2021-33 has also created an opportunity for certain employers that received PPP loan forgiveness, shuttered venue operator grant or restaurant revitalization grant to obtain additional ERC. Employers should review the contents of the notice and the revenue procedure with their tax advisor to determine if additional ERCs may be available, and if so, employers may file Form 941-X to request the additional credit or refund.

Employers should also determine if they may have claimed more ERC than they were entitled to based on the guidance in Notice 2021-49. For example, some small business owners may not have applied the ownership attribution rules correctly. If necessary, Form 941-X may be filed to correct the error. According to the notice, the IRS will not assess penalties for failure to timely pay or deposit tax if the taxpayer can show reasonable cause and not willful neglect for the failure.

H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, proposes to end the ERC on September 30, 2021 rather than December 31 (but recovery startup businesses would remain eligible through year-end). That provision may or may not be included in the infrastructure bill that is eventually signed into law (which is expected in the next month or so).

Enhancing Your Nonprofit Organization In A New World Norm

By Vivian Gant

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the future was still very uncertain. Many nonprofits found themselves applying for government assistance, such as Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, as they braced for continued negative financial impacts. Although the road ahead is still not completely clear, organizations are now looking to the future and considering how to ensure they are set up for success in both the near and long term.

For some organizations, this includes facing a very different challenge: considering how to use a surplus of funds, many of which came from an increase in contributions amid the pandemic as donors looked to support nonprofits’ missions. This leads to a completely different set of questions about how to maximize this advantageous position. The post-pandemic landscape is an opportune time for nonprofits to use these extra funds to re-invest not only in their organization but also their people and, ultimately, their mission.

Although there are a number of ways for nonprofit organizations to reinvest for growth, they should consider focusing on the following:

Enhance Cybersecurity

With cyberattacks on the rise, it has never been more critical for nonprofits to ensure they – and their information – are protected. Nonprofits have access to sensitive donor data, which can make them a target. Organizations should consult with experts to study their current security environment, locate vulnerabilities and make recommendations for improvements. These organizations can then upgrade their current security in order to reduce the chances of an attack, which can lead to diminished trust with donors and stakeholders.

Strengthen Tech Capabilities
As the pandemic taught us, technology helps us stay connected. Nonprofits can use this time to reassess the tools they have in place, those they added amid the pandemic and those they need for future success. Investing in tools that will allow the organization to operate in a hybrid work model, communicate with donors when they can’t be face to face and streamline internal operations will foster better communication and strengthen relationships. The connected workplace that became commonplace amid COVID-19 is not likely to go away anytime soon – in fact, nonprofit leaders should only expect to see an increase in digital tools moving forward. Investing soon and doing so strategically will ensure nonprofits are not left behind in a technology-first future.

Improve Internal Infrastructure

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have come a long way. Nonprofits can reinvest in the organization by updating their current ERP systems, which can be used to manage day-to-day activities and streamline their internal processes. Upgrading to the latest ERP technology can assist not only with fundraising activities, but also with event management, online payment processing for donors, marketing efforts and more.  ERP systems can typically also automate back-office functions, which can help to eliminate redundancies in the organization’s overall operations, helping it to stay focused on its mission.

Establish a Board-Designated Endowment

Another way nonprofits can utilize excess funds is to set up a board-designated endowment. This allows nonprofit boards to set aside funds specifically for board initiatives.

These funds can be invested with a trusted financial institution. To do so, the board should create an investment policy that outlines how the funds are to be invested and establishes what these funds are to be used for – which should align with the organization’s mission.

Invest in Human Capital

The pandemic was a trying time for employees. Compensation increases were likely limited during 2020 as nonprofits attempted to cut costs and save for the unknown, and a lack of in-person interaction left little room for team bonding or training opportunities. Investing in programs or events that promote team bonding or providing opportunities for ongoing education can help make employees feel valued and build trust and goodwill between leadership and staff.

In these unique times, nonprofits should be creative in ways that will help not only their mission but also their workforce. Financial decisions made by nonprofits during this time will likely have lasting effects for years to come, so thinking ahead about how to reinvest in your organization is key.

This article originally appeared in BDO USA, LLP’s “Nonprofit Standard” Blog (July 8, 2021). Copyright © 2021 BDO USA, LLP. All rights reserved. www.bdo.com



Support For Global Minimum Tax And New Allocation Rules Announced From G-7 Finance Ministers

The Group of Seven finance ministers on June 5 issued a statement in support of a 15% global minimum tax imposed on a country-by-country basis, and expressed a commitment to reaching “an equitable solution” on the allocation of taxing rights among jurisdictions.

The G-7 ministers, representing Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the U.S., met in London on June 4-5 to discuss economic initiatives to encourage deeper multilateral economic cooperation.

Pillars 1 and 2

The ministers endorsed the efforts being led by the G20/OECD Inclusive Framework to address the tax challenges arising from globalization and the digitalization of the economy and to adopt a global minimum tax. The OECD’s initiative centers around a two-pronged proposal issued in late 2019. Pillar 1 of the OECD blueprint would revamp tax allocation rules so that a portion of a multinational entity’s residual profit would be taxed in the jurisdiction where the revenue is sourced. Such an allocation would award taxing rights to market countries – broadly, those where a digital business’s users are located — on at least 20% of profits that exceed a 10% margin in the case of the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises. Some of those profits would be allocated using a formula rather than the arm’s length standard. Pillar 2 focuses on the implementation of a global minimum tax.

The announcement in essence declares the ministers’ support for both Pillars 1 and 2 of the OECD plan, and advocates for the notion of reaching agreement on both pillars in tandem.

The ministers vowed to provide international coordination to apply the proposed international tax rules and repeal the various digital services taxes that have proliferated in recent years.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen issued remarks following the close of the finance ministers’ meeting decrying the “global race to the bottom” whereby countries compete by lowering their tax rates.

Yellen lauded the G7 for taking significant steps by committing to a global minimum tax at a rate of “at least 15%.” She did not address the allocation of taxing rights– Pillar 1–in her comments, but at a subsequent press conference, Yellen acknowledged the agreement the finance ministers reached on that topic. Yellen added that the timing of implementation of the agreements remains to be worked out, and stated that “there is broad agreement that these two things go hand in hand.”

Time Frame

While achieving high-level political consensus on these international tax issues at the G7 stage is an important milestone, it is only the first step in a long process.

The next step in that process is the June 30-July 1 meeting of the OECD’s 139-member Inclusive Framework in Paris. 

The finance ministers in their communiqué stated their desire to reach agreement on these proposals at the next meeting of the G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors, scheduled for July 9-10 in Venice. This meeting is expected to yield at least “the outline of a deal,” according to former OECD Secretary General Angel Gurría.

The international meetings will culminate at an Oct. 29-31 meeting of the G-20 leaders in Rome, where participants may finalize the international tax plan.

Domestic legislation in each individual jurisdiction will then have to be enacted to implement any agreement reached by the G-20 and the Inclusive Framework. The timeline for this broad global enactment is uncertain.