Trump’s U.S Trade Policy With China Will Remain The Same

In a major disappointment for importers of goods from China who were hoping that the Biden administration would change the course of Trump’s U.S. trade policy with China, United States Trade Representative (USTR) Katherine Tai indicated on October 4, 2021 that the Section 301 ad valorem tariffs of 25% and 7.5% (depending on each item’s tariff code) will remain in place. Tai did indicate that the tariff exclusion process would be reimplemented. However, she did not provide specific information or details as to when this would occur. The highly anticipated address followed a lengthy internal policy review by the Administration. This review was expected to shed light on the strategy for China moving forward.

Tai pointed to China’s continued state subsidization of key industries that has harmed workers in the U.S. and other countries. These industries include solar panels and its current focus on semiconductors as reasons for continuation of the tariffs.

China has failed to meet its commitments under the “Phase One” agreement it previously entered into with the former Trump administration with regard to the purchase of U.S. agricultural products. The Biden administration will not pursue a phase two agreement. This is because little optimism exists for further negotiations to try and change Chinese behavior on industry subsidization, which is the primary source of contention.

Tai would not state whether the U.S. has plans to initiate another Section 301 investigation if China does not change its position regarding industrial subsidies. However, Tai said that Section 301 is a very important tool for trade enforcement. Tai said she intends to speak with her Chinese counterpart in the near future.

The tariff exclusion process in 2019-2020 allowed U.S. importers the opportunity to remove certain products from the imposition of Section 301 tariffs if the product was not available from non-Chinese sources and the tariffs created an economic hardship. The exclusion requests were filed with USTR, which determined on a case-by-case basis whether to grant the exemptions. All previously granted remaining exclusions expired on December 31, 2020. Although details have not yet been provided, the reimplemented exclusion process will likely be similar to the previous process. Importers should closely monitor announcements from USTR regarding the reimplementation of the exclusion process. Importers should also monitor other announcements such as filing dates and deadlines for the exclusion petitions. 

How we can help

For now, Trump’s U.S. Trade Policy will remain in place. We can assist importers with the preparation and filing of exclusion requests with the United States Trade Representative. Should the exclusion request be granted, we can assist with file administrative protests for the refund of duties should the exclusions be effective retroactively. We can review the tariff classifications for products to determine if a previous tariff exclusion was available. We can also help determine if any refunds can still be claimed based on the entry date of the merchandise.

More information can be found at https://ustr.gov/

House Ways And Means Committee Advances Tax Legislation As Part Of Reconciliation Bill

After almost 40 hours of debate over four days, the House Ways and Means Committee on September 15 approved a tax package that would increase rates on high-net-worth individuals and corporations and affect cross-border activity and pass-through entities, advancing the tax elements of the Biden administration’s “Build Back Better” agenda.

The package advanced on a largely party-line 24-19 vote – no Republicans voted for it, and only one Democrat, Rep. Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., voted against it.

As the next step in the legislative process, the legislation now goes to the House Budget Committee, where it will be combined with bills from other House committees and eventually brought before the full House for a vote as the reconciliation legislation.    


Individuals

The draft legislation would raise the top individual marginal tax rate from the current 37% to 39.6% for taxable income over $450,000 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses, $425,000 for head of households, $400,000 for single individuals, $225,000 for married individuals filing separately, and $12,500 for estates and trusts. The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.

The capital gains tax rate would rise to 25% from 20% for transactions by high-income individuals made after Sept. 13, 2021.

The bill would also create a 3% surcharge on modified gross adjusted income above $5 million, and set a limit on contributions to large individual retirement accounts.

The bill would extend the holding period to obtain long-term capital gains treatment for gain allocated to carried interest partners from three to five years. The three-year holding period would remain in effect with respect to any income attributable to real property trades or businesses and for taxpayers (other than an estate or trust) with adjusted gross income of less than $400,000.


Business Provisions

The legislation would introduce a graduated income tax rate structure for most corporations, with a top corporate tax rate of 26.5%. Corporations with taxable income that does not exceed $400,000 would be subject to a new 18% tax rate (lower than the current 21% rate), while those with income that exceeds $400,000 but does not exceed $5 million would be subject to a 21% tax rate, and those with income in excess of $5 million would be subject to the top 26.5% rate.

On the international front, the bill would reduce the Section 250 deduction for global intangible low-taxed Income (GILTI) to 37.5%, resulting in an effective tax rate of 16.5% based on a corporate tax rate of 26.5%. The GILTI would be calculated on a country-by-country basis. Other international tax provisions include:

  • The deduction for qualified business asset investment (QBAI) would be reduced to 5%;
  • The foreign tax credit haircut would be reduced to 5%;
  • The tax on foreign-derived intangible income would rise to an effective rate of 20.7% based on a corporate tax rate of 26.5%;
  • Excess foreign tax credit carryforwards would be allowed for five years but carrybacks would be disallowed; and
  • A new limitation on interest expense deductions for some multinational corporations would be introduced.


What’s Not in the Bill

The Ways and Means tax bill does not include any changes to the cap on individual itemized deductions for state and local taxes, which was introduced in 2017’s tax reform. Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) has said he is committed to include “meaningful SALT relief” in the final legislation.

A provision to end the tax-free step-up in basis above a $1 million threshold that was proposed by the Biden administration is also not included in the Ways and Means bill.

Written by Todd Simmens. Copyright © 2021 BDO USA, LLP. All rights reserved. www.bdo.com


Tax Issues To Consider When Navigating A SPAC Transaction

The U.S. capital markets have seen record levels of merger and acquisition activity over the last few years, including record use of special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) to facilitate initial public offerings (IPOs). Why are SPACs so popular? With proper planning, SPACs can make the process of going public faster and easier than the traditional IPO route as well as provide other benefits for the acquired company and investors.

Why Choose a SPAC?

SPACs are publicly traded companies formed for the sole purpose of raising capital through an IPO and using the proceeds to acquire one or more unspecified businesses at a future date. A SPAC can provide several benefits for target companies, including:

  • Access to significant capital;
  • Immediate liquidity;
  • Strategic partners and management expertise; and
  • Use of public company stock to fund add-on acquisitions.

The SPAC approach to an IPO takes much less time to complete as compared to a traditional IPO, therefore the amount of time needed to work with investment bankers, attorneys and other professionals to take a company public is potentially reduced. In addition, SPACs generally have a window of approximately two years or less to find a suitable acquisition target, which can increase competition and drive up the values being offered to target companies. 

In addition to understanding the benefits of using a SPAC, it is important that SPAC sponsors and shareholders of target companies understand and plan for the federal income tax consequences associated with SPAC structures.

Tax Treatment of SPAC Sponsors

The SPAC sponsors (or founders) are responsible for forming the SPAC entity, raising capital with investment groups, and taking the SPAC public. Once the SPAC is public, the SPAC must identify potential acquisition targets, undertake due diligence, and complete the acquisition (known as the “de-SPAC” transaction) on terms that will maximize the sponsors’ return on investment.

The sponsors are generally granted an initial, separate class of “founders shares” for a nominal cost, which normally convert to public shares on the completion of the de-SPAC transaction. The timing of the issuance of the founders shares should be carefully planned to avoid undesirable tax consequences for the sponsors.

The sponsors may also receive warrants to purchase additional SPAC shares. For federal income tax purposes, the warrants received are treated as investment warrants as long as the issuance of the warrants is not dependent on the sponsor’s employment status or in exchange for services provided as an employee of the SPAC. Investment warrants are not taxable when issued or exercised but result in taxable capital gain for the sponsor when the underlying shares are sold (a sale will result in long-term capital gain for the sponsor if the underlying stock is held for more than a year).

Warrants received by sponsors that have employment arrangements with the SPAC may be treated as compensatory warrants issued for services. Recipients of compensatory warrants generally do not recognize taxable income upon the grant of the warrant as long as the warrant provides for a fair market value (FMV) exercise price. However, the excess of the FMV of the warrant over its exercise price generally is taxable income to the sponsor at the time the warrant becomes transferable or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (generally when the warrant is exercised). This also marks the time when the issuing company is entitled to deduct the compensation expense on its corporate federal income tax return.

Tax Treatment of Target Shareholders

A traditional de-SPAC transaction is structured as a “reverse triangular merger” for federal income tax purposes. The SPAC creates a transitory merger subsidiary that merges with and into the target, with the target surviving as a subsidiary of the public SPAC. Shareholders of the target receive SPAC stock in exchange for their target shares.

The de-SPAC transaction is generally structured to be tax-free to the target shareholders, provided the merger meets the statutory requirements needed to qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. These requirements include:

  • The target company’s shareholders exchange stock constituting control of the target company for voting stock of the SPAC;
  • At least 80% of the total consideration paid to the target company’s shareholders is SPAC voting stock; and
  • After the merger, the target company holds “substantially all” of its assets.

In addition, the merger must meet certain continuity of shareholder interest, continuity of business enterprise and business purpose requirements.

Regardless of whether the merger qualifies as tax-free, any consideration received other than SPAC voting stock, i.e., cash or other property (referred to as “boot”), will be taxable to the target shareholders. The taxable amount is the FMV of the boot received.

The target entity that can be a party to a traditional de-SPAC transaction reorganization is normally an S corporation or a C corporation. An entity taxed as a partnership can participate in what is known as an “UP-SPAC” transaction (see discussion below). It is important to note that if the target is an S corporation, its S status will terminate in the de-SPAC transaction since a SPAC (which is taxed as a C corporation) is not an eligible S corporation shareholder.

Other Considerations

There are numerous other tax and non-tax considerations when planning for SPAC transactions. These include, for example:

  • The tax treatment of transaction costs and start-up expenses;
  • Potential limitations on net operating losses and other tax attributes due to a change in ownership of the target company;
  • International considerations such as selection of the jurisdiction where the SPAC is formed and the consequences of passive foreign investment company (PFIC) status; and
  • Additional financial reporting and accounting complexities for public companies, including SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley requirements.

Partnership IPOs: UP-Cs and UP-SPACs

While a partnership target cannot be acquired by a SPAC in a tax-free reverse triangular reorganization or merger, businesses operating as partnerships that want to go public have the option of a traditional incorporation and IPO, an umbrella partnership C corporation (“Up-C”) structure, or an umbrella partnership SPAC (“Up-SPAC”) structure, all of which have their own tax consequences. Both the Up-C and Up-SPAC structures allow the target to remain in pass-through entity form while also providing the target owners with easier access to future liquidity.

Under the Up-C/Up-SPAC structures, either a C corporation or a SPAC raises funds through an IPO, which are then used to acquire an interest in the target partnership. The target’s partners exchange their partnership interests for publicly traded shares. By electing to use a basis step-up adjustment mechanism and a tax receivable agreement, the partners are paid for a portion of the public company’s tax benefits in the form of an earnout.

Partners that materially participate in the business can avoid the net investment income tax on the exchange of their partnership interest for the publicly traded shares. In addition, the publicly traded shares will have a stepped-up basis when subsequently sold in the market. Therefore, gain may be avoided if the shares are sold immediately after the exchange. 

​Although SPACs can provide advantages over other deal structures, the SPAC IPO process and the de-SPAC transaction are highly regulated and complex transactions that require intensive planning and preparation. In addition, there are a number of tax challenges and complexities for financial statement and tax reporting purposes that should be considered up front. Rushing through the process without the right expertise can put a successful outcome at risk, not to mention loss of funding and reputation of the sponsors. Companies should employ trustworthy and experienced legal, capital, and accounting advisors to ensure a smooth transaction.