Get To Know Potential Tax Policies For 2020 Election

The U.S. presidential election is just over a month away, yet neither candidate has released a formal, detailed plan addressing his vision for the tax code. We can, however, gain a sense of how their approaches differ through casual mentions of some aspects of tax policy on the campaign trail.

Tax policy underpins business decisions and consumer behavior, so an understanding of the candidates’ more detailed vision for tax policy will be intrinsic to successfully navigating the economic downturn triggered by the pandemic. Savvy businesses and individuals should pay close attention to how any proposed policy may ultimately alter their total tax liability.

It’s also important to keep in mind the fundamental role of Congress in passing tax legislation.  Depending on the makeup of the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives, passing tax legislation may be challenging.  For example, if both the Senate and House are of the same party as the successful presidential candidate, any changes in tax law may still have to be passed through the budget reconciliation process, because 60 votes in the Senate generally would be needed to avoid using the reconciliation process (and it is very doubtful that there would be 60 members of the Senate of the same party). Both in 2017 and 2001, passing tax legislation through reconciliation meant that most of the changes were not permanent; that is, they expired within the 10-year budget window. If any of the White House, Senate, or House are of a majority party different than the others, the chances of passing and enacting any agreed-to tax legislation becomes more doubtful.

The following table contains side-by-side snapshots of current and potential future tax policies of the presidential candidates as of September 22, 2020, from what has been mentioned informally on the campaign trail.
  

 Current Tax Law
(TCJA–present)
Biden’s stated goalsTrump’s stated goals
Corporate tax rates and AMTCorporations have a flat 21% tax rate and no corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT), which were both changed by the TCJA.
These do not expire.
Biden would raise the flat rate to the pre-TCJA level of 28% and reinstate the corporate AMT on profits of $100 million or more.
 
Trump has not announced changes and has no plans to reinstate a corporate AMT.
Capital gains and dividendsThe top tax rate is 20% for income over $441,450 for individuals and $496,600 for married filing jointly. There is an additional 3.8% net investment income tax.Biden would eliminate breaks for capital gains and dividends for income above $1 million. Instead, these would be taxed at ordinary rates.Trump would reduce the capital gains tax rates, index capital gains for inflation and create a capital gains tax holiday that would eliminate capital gains taxes for a period of time TBD.
Payroll taxesThe 12.4% payroll tax is divided evenly between employers and employees and applies to the first $137,700 of an individual’s income.Biden would maintain the 12.4% tax split between employers and employees and keep the $137,700 cap but would institute the tax on earned income above $400,000. The gap between the two wage levels would gradually close with annual inflationary increases.Trump issued an executive order to temporarily postpone social security tax for employees from Sept. 1 through Dec. 31,2020.
He has indicated he would make this temporary reprieve permanent.
Estate taxesThe estate tax exemption for 2020is $11,580,000.  Transfers of appreciated property at death get a step-up in basis.
The exemption is scheduled to revert to pre-TCJA levels, or $5,800,000, in 2025.
Biden would maintain the 2025 reversion and eliminate the current step-up in basis on inherited assets.Trump would push to extend the exemption and would not change the transfer of appreciated property step-up in basis.
Individual tax ratesThe top marginal rate is 37% for income over $518,400 for individuals and $622,050 for married filing jointly. This was lowered from 39.6% pre-TCJA.Biden would restore the 39.6% rate for taxable income above $400,000. This represents only the top rate.Trump would keep the current status quo of 37%. In addition, he would enact a 10% rate cut for middle-class taxpayers, which would lower the 22% rate to 15%.
For 2020, the 22% rate applies to income over $40,125 for individuals and $80,250 for married filing jointly.
Individual tax creditsCurrently, individuals can claim a maximum of $2,000 Child Tax Credit (CTC)plus a $500 dependent credit.
Individuals may claim a maximum dependent care credit of $600 ($1,200 for two or more children).
The CTC is scheduled to revert to pre-TCJA levels ($1,000) after 2025.
Biden would increase the CTC to $8,000 ($16,000 for two or more children).Trump would extend the $2,000 CTC past 2025, however, he would also require social security numbers to be eligible to take any of these credits.
EducationForgiven student loan debt is included in taxable income.
There is no tax credit for contributions to state-authorized organizations that sponsor scholarships.
Biden would exclude forgiven student loan debt from taxable income.
 
Trump would provide a tax credit for individual and corporate donations to state-authorized organizations that sponsor scholarships.
 
Itemized deductionsFor 2020, the standard deduction is $12,400 for single/married filing separately and $24,800 for married filing jointly.
After 2025, the standard deduction is scheduled to revert to pre-TCJA amounts, or $6,350 for single /married filing separately and $12,700 for married filing jointly.
 
The TCJA suspended the personal exemption and most individual deductions through 2025.
It also capped the SALT deduction at $10,000, which will remain in place until 2025, unless repealed.
Biden would enact a provision that would cap the tax benefit of itemized deductions at 28%.
SALT cap: Senate minority leader Charles Schumer has pledged to repeal the cap should Biden win in November (the House of Representatives has already passed legislation to repeal to the SALT cap).
Trump would extend beyond 2025 and make permanent the deductions established by the TCJA.
 
 

While the candidates’ tax policy plans are not yet publicly formalized, more details may be released as we approach election day. We will be updating election tax policy content as it becomes available.

ASC 740 – FASB Issues ASU On Simplifying The Accounting For Income Taxes

On December 18, 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2019-12 on Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The decisions reflected in the ASU update specific areas of ASC 740, Income Taxes, to reduce complexity while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements.

Background: At its April 10, 2019, meeting, the FASB decided to add a project to its technical agenda to address simplifications to the accounting rules for income taxes under ASC 740. The project is part of the board’s overall Simplification Initiative. The objective of the Simplification Initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information required to be reported by an entity. A draft ASU was issued by the FASB in May 2019 with 24 comment letters provided by stakeholders at the end of June 2019.

Transition and Effective Date: For public business entities, the amendments in the ASU 2019-12 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022.
 
Early adoption of the amendments is permitted, including adoption in any interim period for (1) public business entities for periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. An entity that elects to early adopt the amendments in an interim period should reflect any adjustments as of the beginning of the annual period that includes that interim period. Additionally, an entity that elects early adoption must adopt all the amendments in the same period.
 
The amendments in ASU 2019-12 related to separate financial statements of legal entities that are not subject to tax should be applied on a retrospective basis for all periods presented.
 
The amendments related to changes in ownership of foreign equity method investments or foreign subsidiaries should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.
 
The amendments related to franchise taxes that are partially based on income should be applied on either a retrospective basis for all periods presented or a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.
 
All other amendments should be applied on a prospective basis.