U.S. Senate Gives Official Approval For Bipartisan Infrastructure Package

In less than 24 hours, the U.S. Senate voted to advance two legislative packages that would result in combined spending of approximately $4.5 trillion in both traditional infrastructure projects and an expansive array of initiatives encompassing healthcare, education and climate change.

On Tuesday, August 10, the Senate voted 69 to 30 in favor of a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure bill.   The 2,700-page “Infrastructure One” bill would fund investment in improvements to the country’s roads, bridges, highways and Internet connections. Then early Wednesday morning, the Senate approved, on a party line 50-49 vote, a $3.5 trillion budget resolution—“Infrastructure  Two”—that could enable sweeping changes to a broad range of laws to secure enactment of the Biden administration’s “Build Back Better” agenda. The Senate’s adoption of the budget resolution sets the stage for the budget reconciliation process; legislation passed under these procedures generally cannot be filibustered, so that only a simple majority is required for Senate passage.

The budget resolution now heads to the House, which is expected to return from recess the week of August 23 to consider the measure.

Infrastructure One – Tax-Related Provisions

The Infrastructure One package, the “Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,” does not include major corporate or individual tax proposals, but it does contain some tax provisions that would raise $50 billion in net revenue. For example, the legislation includes a provision that would amend Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6045 to expand information reporting requirements to include brokers or any person who is responsible for regularly providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets, including cryptocurrency, on behalf of another person. The measure would also add digital assets to current rules that require businesses to report cash payments over $10,000. This provision would apply to returns required to be filed after Dec. 31, 2023.

The cryptocurrency provisions in the Infrastructure One bill ran into some headwinds in the Senate over attempts to amend the definition of “broker.” Several amendments were introduced, but none were passed, and the bill now heads to the House for consideration. But the issue may not have been put to rest, as press reports indicate that both Republican and Democratic House members support amending the definition, which they deem to be too broad.

The Infrastructure One bill also includes a provision that would amend IRC Section 3134 to terminate the employee retention credit on October 1, 2021, three months earlier than the current Jan. 1, 2022 end date. The provision would apply to calendar quarters beginning after Sep. 30, 2021.

Another revenue raiser included is a provision that would modify the IRC Section 430(h)(2)(C)(iv) table of applicable minimum and maximum percentages with respect to certain pension plans, known as “pension smoothing,” which is estimated to raise approximately $2.9 billion over a 10-year period by reducing the level of deductible employer pension contributions required under the pension funding rules. These amendments would apply to plan years beginning after Dec. 31, 2021.

The bill would also reinstate and modify some expired Superfund excise taxes imposed on the production of specified chemicals.

Infrastructure Two

Approval of the budget resolution by both the House and the Senate would allow Senate Democrats to use the budget reconciliation process to advance their tax policy agenda without Republican support.

While the Infrastructure One package generally avoids consideration of the administration’s tax policy priorities, the broader Infrastructure Two bill is to be fully offset by a combination of new tax revenues, healthcare savings and long-term economic growth. In addition, the agreed-to framework would prohibit new taxes on families making less than $400,000 per year and on small businesses and family farms.

Policy priorities included in the Infrastructure Two package include:

  • Paid family and medical leave
  • ACA expansion extension and filling the Medicaid coverage gap
  • Expanding Medicare to include dental, vision, hearing benefits and lowering the eligibility age
  • Addressing healthcare provider shortages (graduate medical education)
  • Child tax credit, earned income tax credit and child and dependent care tax credit extension
  • Long-term care for seniors and persons with disabilities
  • Clean energy, manufacturing and transportation tax incentives
  • Pro-worker incentives and worker support
  • Health equity (maternal, behavioral and racial justice health investments)
  • Housing incentives
  • State and local tax cap relief

In a memorandum issued August 9, Senate Democrats called for the following measures to offset the cost of these provisions:

  • Corporate and international tax reform
  • “Tax fairness” for high-income individuals
  • Enhanced IRS tax enforcement
  • Healthcare savings
  • Carbon polluter import fee

The memorandum explains that the Finance Committee’s reconciliation product will account for both substantial portions of the investments contemplated by the $3.5 trillion package but also nearly all of the stated offsets.

Next Steps

It is expected that further action on both bills will be taken in the fall when both the House and Senate return from August recess.

Department Of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity Requirements For Pipeline Owners And Operators

On Friday, May 7, 2021, Colonial Pipeline fell victim to a cyberattack that resounded throughout the pipeline owners and operators industry, resulting in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issuing two directives in response to the threat. The Colonial Pipeline cyberattack forced the company to proactively close down operations and disable IT systems. The perpetrators targeted the business side of the pipeline rather than operational systems as the motive was monetary rather than meant to halt pipeline activities.[1] Colonial Pipeline leadership made the difficult decision to cease the operations systems as well as the internal IT systems for purposes of protecting this critical infrastructure from possible compromise.

The shutdown of operations resulted in gasoline shortages from Texas through the Southeast, up the Eastern seaboard and through New Jersey. This type of disturbance in the supply chain was considered a threat to our national security.

Therefore, on May 27, 2021, DHS issued an initial cybersecurity requirement (“initial security directive” or “Security Directive”) for critical pipeline owners and operators: “The Security Directive [required] critical pipeline owners and operators to report confirmed and potential cybersecurity incidents to the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and to designate a Cybersecurity Coordinator, to be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.  It also require[d] critical pipeline owners and operators to review their current practices as well as to identify any gaps and related remediation measures to address cyber-related risks and report the results to TSA and CISA within 30 days.”[2]

On July 20, 2021, after further review of this Security Directive, DHS’ Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued a second Security Directive that requires “…operators of TSA-designated critical pipelines that transport hazardous liquids and natural gas to implement a number of urgently needed protections against cyber intrusions.”[3]

The TSA has stated: “[T]his Security Directive requires owners and operators of TSA-designated critical pipelines to implement specific mitigation measures to protect against ransomware attacks and other known threats to information technology and operational technology systems, develop and implement a cybersecurity contingency and recovery plan, and conduct a cybersecurity architecture design review.”

The challenging aspects of the second Security Directive, which builds on the initial Security Directive, are (1) the level of detail of the requirements, and (2) the strict timeframes that are imposed on each of the approximately fifty provisions outlined within the requirements. The timeframes range from 30-120 days for completion of specific criteria.

Additionally, further challenges will now require pipeline owners and operators to focus not only on their internal information technology systems, but also to pay particular attention to their operational technology systems when putting together mitigation measures to protect this portion of U.S. critical infrastructure. Having two systems, internal and operational—or client-facing systems—mirrors the telecommunications industry where each service provider has requirements to protect their internal systems along with those that support the Domestic Communications Infrastructure, or “DCI”.

Mitigations measures that can be considered by pipeline owners and operators include the following:

  • Overall plans for continuous monitoring of internal and operational systems.
  • Dedicated resources to communicate with members of DHS.
  • Annual independent third-party audits of physical and logical security controls.
  • Consideration for independent third-party monitorships who have the resources and expertise in information system infrastructure, security resiliency and working relationships with U.S. governmental agencies.

Knowing and understanding the most current DHS expectations can go a long way in facilitating compliance with the TSA second Security Directive for pipeline owners and operators.


[1] https://www.zdnet.com/article/colonial-pipeline-ransomware-attack-everything-you-need-to-know/

[2] https://www.dhs.gov/news/2021/05/27/dhs-announces-new-cybersecurity-requirements-critical-pipeline-owners-and-operators

[3] https://www.dhs.gov/news/2021/07/20/dhs-announces-new-cybersecurity-requirements-critical-pipeline-owners-and-operators

Construction Company Considerations In New Administration

  • Infrastructure plan is an opportunity for the industry to improve its reputation
  • Construction firms are entering into joint ventures to bid on large projects
  • Data analytics can identify labor overages: case study

President Biden’s infrastructure plan is set to improve failing infrastructure, rebuild the economy and create new jobs. As of this writing, the plan, which Biden originally released on March 31 as a $2 trillion capital injection over 10 years, is a $579 billion proposal that has bipartisan agreement, though Democrats have signaled the bill may only move through Congress in tandem with a larger spending and tax increase package, which they may try to pass via the reconciliation process.

Regardless of what the infrastructure plan may ultimately look like, construction companies should consider what an increase in project demand could mean for their businesses. Already, some construction companies whose balance sheets might be too small or who don’t want to take on all the risk, are striking joint ventures or partnerships to bid on large projects that are anticipated to result from the infrastructure bill.

Construction firms should also consider changing workforce needs. The construction industry has faced a shortage of skilled workers since the last recession, and as project demand is expected to spike, recruiting and training a workforce with the skills required of infrastructure projects today will be essential.

According to a recent study by Moody’s Analytics, the economy would add about 19 million jobs between the fourth quarter of 2020 and the fourth quarter of 2030, and construction companies with experience in clean energy would likely benefit the most from the projected spend. Infrastructure projects today are more likely to be capital- and skill-intensive than they were in the New Deal era, according to a Brookings report.

A functioning infrastructure facilitates economic activity, and infrastructure investment supports job creation—two pillars of Biden’s approach to stimulating the post-pandemic economy. Infrastructure spending is often looked to as part of the solution for a depressed economy or labor market. While the economy has rebounded from its March 2020 lows, the unemployment rate is 5.9%, according to a July 2 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics report. The proposed plan aimed to create 5 million new jobs lost in the broader economy during the past year, including those in the construction industry.

Tech opportunities are reshaping the industry

Since 1998, America’s infrastructure has earned a consistent D- grade from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Though it improved slightly to C- in 2021, the ASCE said the country is spending only half of what is required to support its infrastructure—which over time will result in significant economic loss, higher costs to businesses, consumers and manufacturers, and public safety concerns. The report also estimates that the gap between the country’s infrastructure needs and its likely spending on those needs is projected to top $2.6 trillion by 2029 and more than $5.6 trillion by 2039.

Construction leaders will need to do more than amplify recruiting efforts and diversify their skill sets to remain competitive and keep up with demand. They will need to continue to prioritize investing in technologies—artificial intelligence, robotics and machine learning, for example—and to implement time- and cost-reducing strategies, such as offsite construction.

While implementing one of these investments or strategies alone would not give a contractor a major competitive advantage, in aggregate they create greater overall efficiency and productivity. Internal efficiencies can then translate into lower project cost estimates.

The global pandemic has accelerated the construction industry’s adoption of technology considerably; the industry is poised to look very different in five to ten years. Data derived from new technologies can be used to increase transparency, build trust and ultimately improve the industry’s reputation over the long term. Online bid management platforms, for example, allow companies to digitize documents, making them clickable and giving prospects the ability to drill into the underlying details of estimates.

The opportunity to invest in the nation’s underinvested infrastructure will require a robust response from the construction industry, and construction leaders should be prepared for more incoming projects and infrastructure improvements over the next decade. While the short-term opportunity deriving from the infrastructure plan means construction companies may win more business, the long-term opportunity is for the industry as a whole to leverage technologies that increase transparency—offering prospects insights into customers, data, costs and projects—and thus improve reputation.